Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 861 - 880
of 14,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2022, 3:29 am
It either exists or it doesn't. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
This Kat can't actually offer you any, but the next best thing is a guest post from Katfriend and occasional contributor Valentina Torelli on a ruling from Europe's top court today on a trade mark for chocolate. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:36 pm
I don't. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 11:00 am
” [The court is quoting other cases but if it’s a trademark theory she shouldn’t be able to use it without more than intent; intent to use a mark is not enough to have a protectable mark in any other context. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
Mark is no Frankfurter fan, and he's called Frankfurter "sloppy" about procedural matters dear to the justice's heart. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:29 pm
: I don’t think I’ll put this under “Great Books According to Me,” although I do think it is pretty great. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
Lightbourne,Circuit Court Case No. 1981-170-CF-A-01, Marion County. 4 On July 18, 2007, the Governor signed a warrant for the execution of Mark Schwab. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 3:44 am
Now it's a matter of offending God? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
You sign under penalty of perjury; penalties for clients would matter. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm
" The applicability of Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 to cases where the summons to oral proceedings were notified before the entry into force of the RPBA 2020 has been a topic of the present appeal.The decision is further issued, in part, in abridged form according to the new provisions of Article 15(7)-(8) RPBA2020 and also already used (to our knowledge for the first time) for T 1687/17 of 9 January 2020.Summary of Facts and SubmissionsI. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
"In March 2011 Dalsouple Société Saumuroise Du Caoutchouc (""Dalsouple France") sought to extend its international trade mark registration for the word mark DALSOUPLE, which it held for goods in Classes 17, 19 and 27 (mainly rubber flooring products). to the UK. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
The emails concerned subscription matters or comments regarding the magazine. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Since disclaimers often don’t work, especially when they’re about matters that are immaterial to most consumers, I’d suggest it doesn’t make sense to make protection from trademark claims based on copying an expressive work or functional item turn on whether or not there was some sort of disclaimer.)So, in Dastar and Traffix, for example, the Court cautioned against “misuse or over-extension” of trademark and related protections… [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:51 am
by Tom Fox Does Hurd’s New Oracle Gig Prove Business Ethics Don’t Matter? [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:24 am
"]July 14, 2015 - 2:30 PM: In re Shanon Preston, Serial No. 85864264 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark GET CENSORED for "Clothing sold only through owner's online store, namely, hats, jackets, pants, rash guards, shirts, shorts, sleepwear, sports bra, sweat pants, sweat shirts, swim wear, t-shirts, tops, underwear, and yoga pants" on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark CENSORED for jeans, shirts, shorts, and other… [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:35 am
” So there it was—as a consumer I had been confused, but from the point of view of the trade mark owner, it would appear that the confusion did not matter. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
That didn’t mean Dfinity’s marks were weak; Meta didn’t show how recognizable those marks were compared to Dfinity’s. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
G 2/04 [3.2.5], and T 1178/04 [27, 31, 34]). [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:19 am
(p. 21).Disclaimed matter that is descriptive of a party’s goods is typically less significant or less dominant when comparing marks. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:13 am
In its view, the mark applied for and each of the earlier marks were sufficiently dissimilar to exclude any likelihood of confusion on the part of the relevant public -- no matter how similar the goods concerned were and despite the fact that the distinctiveness of the earlier trade marks was higher than average. [read post]
