Search for: "McDONALD v. STATE"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 1:04 am
" Message from Malta: Kmiec Comments on Chicago Gun Case "The dramatic oral argument on Tuesday in the case of McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:53 am
It’s possible that Liebeck v McDonald’s would be decided differently today - with drinking coffee while driving reducing the punitive damages even further under a more recognized state of contributory negligence. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:05 am
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
"*** The Court of Appeals has already decided that health insurance for retirees is not a retirement benefit protected against being diminished or impaired by the State's Constitution [Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313].** Regarding a municipality's providing health insurance benefits to its retirees, in McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, a decision that could significantly affect a municipal retiree's… [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:01 pm
Univ. of Cincinnati v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:35 pm
Hernández Almodóvar passed along another Puerto Rico Second Amendment case, this one a trial court decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:07 pm
Two years later (in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:21 pm
On Monday, June 28, 2010, in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 5:09 pm
In Howell v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 9:38 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:22 am
From Butcher v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Heller affirmed the individual right to keep and bear arms, and McDonald v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:30 pm
Talk about trashing the Constitution.Justice Scalia continued along these lines at oral argument today in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:23 pm
Co. 2010 Van Jura, J.)In the case of McDonald v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:53 pm
Recent Federal Court jurisprudence The recent decision of Justice Lee in Elliott-Carde v McDonald’s Australia Limited (Stay Application) [2023] FCA 1210 (McDonald’s) and his Honour’s comments in Transport Workers Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited (NSD1309/2020) have clarified that proceedings under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Fair Work Act) do not preclude class action proceedings under Part IVA of the Federal Court… [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:37 am
The upcoming case, known as McDonald v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:50 am
More interesting to me is the sentencing issue raised in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:59 am
The paradox of McDonald v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 10:37 am
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
