Search for: "Michaels v State"
Results 861 - 880
of 13,655
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
In the most comprehensive iteration of the theory (which I dub version 3.0), Michael Newton argues that the ICC’s prescriptive and adjudicative jurisdiction is limited to whatever the State can transfer to it, meaning that a Status of Forces Agreement (“SOFA”) granting the United States jurisdiction over crimes committed by its troops in Afghanistan means that Afghanistan cannot “delegate” jurisdiction over U.S. nationals to the Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
As I noted in the Verdict column, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
United States, 21-8190 Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:35 am
Miller v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:17 am
Disrespect 1Barbato v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:05 pm
Michael Weingartner & Carolyn Shapiro (IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law) have posted After the Oral Argument in Moore v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
Many thanks to Michael Gordon and Paul Scott for their useful comments on a previous draft. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:37 am
For example, in Michael Grecco Prods. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:36 pm
Federal Republic of Germany Daniele Amoroso & Riccardo Pavoni, Stergiopoulos v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Michael P. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Michael P. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Respondent Michael J. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Respondent Michael J. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:48 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]