Search for: "Michigan v. Ohio" Results 861 - 880 of 1,355
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 4:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Thoughts on Limiting Liability for Employee Misconduct - West Bloomfield lawyer Jason Shinn of E-Business Counsel on his blog, Michigan Employment Law Advisor Grooveshark v Universal: Can you believe some people? [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:11 am by Phil Cave
While most commentators celebrated the demise of the incoherent Ohio v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:06 am by Neil Rosenbaum
The cost of the long, hard discovery slog that usually precedes class certification is reason enough for defendants in putative class actions -- particularly those in the Sixth Circuit states of Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee -- to take a close look at whether there is a better way. - Robert J. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
Obama, et al. (11-117); National Federation of Independent Business, et al., v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:32 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio 2006). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:30 am by Jon Hyman
– from Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog The Dark, Ugly Side of Using Unpaid Interns (under the FLSA) – from SmartHR President And CEO Personally Liable For Wage And Hour Violations In Torres v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
Levin, a satellite television provider is challenging the constitutionality of an Ohio law that imposes greater taxes on it than on cable television companies doing business in that state, while in Sandy Creek Energy Associates v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
With respect to habeas corpus, two cases involve Michigan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 8:28 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 105378 (WD MI, Sept. 16, 2011), a Michigan federal district court rejected qualified immunity for defendants who improperly relied on an inmate's objective knowledge of his religion to determine his religious sincerity.In Ali v. [read post]