Search for: "Miller v. State of California" Results 861 - 880 of 1,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Why Would Congress Pass a Completely Useless Law?
27 Sep 2010, 8:37 pm
 Because under  Miller v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Child Pornography, the External Hard Drive and the Password
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
District Court for the Northern District of California:  U.S. v. [read post]
CYB3RCRIM3 - http://cyb3rcrim3.blogspot.com/
Historical Correction? Second District Holds City’s Policy Decision To Remove And Relocate “Offensive” Statue That Was Replica of Earlier Historic Landmark Qualified For CEQA’s Common Sense Exemption Because Substantial Evidence Supported City’s Finding That, Despite Its Earlier Erroneous Listing, Replica Was Never Actually A Historically Significant Resource
12 Jun 2023, 9:26 am by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Holds Short CEQA Statute Of Limitations Not Triggered By NOD That Fails To Provide Public Notice Of Material Changes In Project As Actually Constructed From That Described In EIR
29 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sixth District Holds CEQA’s “Fair Argument” Test Inapplicable To City Of San Jose’s Discretionary Determination That 1922 Wooden Railroad Trestle Is Not Historical Resource
15 Aug 2016, 10:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
” A State Historic Preservation Officer letter stated the 2004 project would not affect any “historic properties. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Holds Non-Expert Opinion Fails To Support “Fair Argument” Under CEQA That Approval of Non-Regional Retail Store In Joshua Tree Would Cause Urban Decay
14 Jul 2016, 6:50 pm by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Is the Popularity of Short-Term Rentals Sustainable, or Will Regulations Weaken Their Current Stronghold?
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am by Whitney Hodges
STRs are central to vigorous debates at local and state levels. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
Is the Popularity of Short-Term Rentals Sustainable, or Will Regulations Weaken Their Current Stronghold?
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am by Whitney Hodges
STRs are central to vigorous debates at local and state levels. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
Once More Into the “Brambled Thicket”: Fourth District Reverses Ruling Sustaining Demurrer to Action Challenging Caltrans’ Claim of Statutory CEQA Exemption For Freeway Interchange Project, Holds Streets and Highways Code § 103’s Coastal Commission Exemption Does Not Apply And That Petition Adequately Pleaded Estoppel Against Caltrans to Assert 35-Day Statute of Limitations Based on NOE Filing
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Citizens for a Responsible Caltrans Decision v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Law and Media Round Up – 6 March 2017
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Facebook the Northern District of California has accepted that Facebook’s Terms of Service include valid a choice-of-law California law provision. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Another Call for CEQA Litigation Reform?  Second District Rejects NIMBY Group’s CEQA, Coastal Act, and Land Use Challenges, Affirms Judgment Upholding Approval of Zoning-Compliant And CEQA-Exempt Eldercare Facility On Flat, Graded, Vacant One-Acre Infill Site Surrounded By Residential and Commercial Development
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Stanford Law’s Shirin Sinnar on the Travel Ban, Three Years On
27 Jan 2020, 6:07 am by Shirin Sinnar, Q&A with Sharon Driscoll
In a separate case in the Northern District of California, Emami v. [read post]
Legal Aggregate - https://law.stanford.edu/legal-aggregate/
Relist Watch
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587, Trump v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Of Phantom Damages, Collateral Sources, and Windfalls
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Another Front in the Same-Sex Equality Campaign: Jury Service, Peremptory Challenges, and the Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Abbott Laboratories Case Pending in the Ninth Circuit
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  That is why the Supreme Court’s failure to make clear the standard of review it was applying in United States v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Video from the 2017 Aspen Security Forum
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post   That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro Sasae,… [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
The Legal Price of Adultery Goes Down: North Carolina and West Virginia Abandon Heartbalm Actions
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Lawrence M. Friedman
” California followed suit in 1939. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
2020 Presidential Election Legal Maneuvering: Prominent Lawyers and Law Professors File Lawsuit Challenging Winner-Take-All Method Used by Texas (and Most Other States) to Pick Presidential Electors
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
When They Don’t Have Anything, They’ll Try Anything
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
  See, e.g., Miller v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
No semantics when it comes to life
16 Aug 2012, 6:21 pm by Gideon
According to the California Supreme Court, it is. [read post]
A Public Defender - http://publicdefender.typepad.com/public_defender_blog/