Search for: "Miller v. THE PEOPLE"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:54 am
A WCAB panel upheld Miller's decision last January. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:10 am
Miller, 503 N.W.2d at 424. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm
Relying solely on a criminal case citing a personal injury case – both of which dealt with minimum constitutional requirements for memorandum opinions of appellate courts to “state reasons for the disposition” (see People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:10 am
This new edition includes expanded coverage of the Roberts Court’s juvenile justice decisions including Miller v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am
Finally, it appears that the review procedure does not apply to sentences to life with parole under North Carolina’s Miller v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am
Finally, it appears that the review procedure does not apply to sentences to life with parole under North Carolina’s Miller v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:48 am
Here, the court disagreed, quoting Miller v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am
” Henry Miller of Forbes urges the Court to grant review in American Farm Bureau Federation v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
” This past summer, in State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:58 am
Cockrell, Miller-El v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:08 am
Miller, 687 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2012) and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:41 am
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:16 am
Frank was probably referring to the SEC enforcement action in SEC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:18 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:13 pm
The Pennsylvania case is Kristufek v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:35 am
(People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
In its recent opinion in People v. [read post]
