Search for: "Most v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 71,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:46 am
Consider Bauer and Braxton Minerals II v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:50 pm
Most law students encounter Summers v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
In Lucia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
In Hester v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Glenn: Cindy Hogan-Cross v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Kirilenko v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 10:02 am
Supreme Court took aim at the administrative state in its most recent term, especially in its 6-3 SEC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:18 pm
Various people indicated that the most likely person to have done this was Mr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:43 pm
I recently received a poll asking me what I thought was the most important environmental case that ever came out of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:59 am
They say timing is everything and it certainly was when the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ClientEarth v The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2015] UKSC 28 on 29 April 2015. [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:40 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am
United States and his concurring opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
In Rose v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:53 am
See Kinetic Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2004, 11:07 am
Winn, here, here, and most recently here. [read post]
