Search for: "Mr. X" Results 861 - 880 of 2,304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2016, 9:34 am by familoo
Mr Justice Peter Jackson was not impressed at the actions of a father who did so repeatedly, in order to gather evidence in a court dispute about his daughter (See Guardian article here for summary). [read post]
6 May 2016, 9:54 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Davis CA, Ciampaglia GL, Aiello LM, Chung K, Conover MD, Ferrara E, Flammini A, Fox GC, Gao X, Gonçalves B, Grabowicz PA, Hong K, Hui P, McCaulay S, McKelvey K, Meiss MR, Patil S, Peli Kankanamalage C, Pentchev V, Qiu J, Ratkiewicz J, Rudnick A, Serrette B, Shiralkar P, Varol O, Weng L, Wu T, Younge AJ, Menczer F. (2016) OSoMe: The IUNI observatory on social media. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
 Hidden expertise in the UK Patents Court in Electromagnetic Geoservices v Petroleum Geo-Services dispute Guest post from Katfriend Eibhlin Vardy on decision from Mr Justice Birss about the utility of teach-ins for judges on technical subject matter by independent scientific advisers.Patentability of user interface designs - Part 1 of 2: the EPO approach The exclusion of presentations of information as such from patentability has led to diverse case law of the Boards of… [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
First, r'fua shleima to Mr Stossel:"I write this from the hospital. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 1:31 pm by emagraken
In assessing non-pecuniary damages at $75,000 then reducing this figure to $60,000 on account of the Plaintiff’s failure to mitigate Mr. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:46 am
.* American Science's mobile X-ray scanner patent validAmerikat Annsley reports Mr Justice Arnold's decision in American Science & Engineering Inc v Rapiscan Systems Limited - but try as she might she can't find a cited case.* If you need to prove use as part of your opposition, this is for you Valentina Torelli discusses the General Court's decision  T-638/14 (Spanish) which seems to say that assessment of proof of use of a… [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 10:37 am
 Mr Justice Arnold upheld the patentee's invention relating to a covert mobile X-ray security scanning system as valid. [read post]