Search for: "National Service Industries v. Powers"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2021, 4:32 am
Pan v Cheng; Zhou v Cheng [2021] NSWSC 30 – Mr Henry Pan and Chinese Australian Services Society Limited (hereinafter “CASS”) sue for a series of publications said to have been published by the defendant about the first plaintiff and CASS. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Editors emerge A long list of national newspaper editors took their turn in the witness box, some more comfortable than others. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
The IP Court of Venice held that a work created by a lawyer for their client in the provision of legal services was protected by copyright law. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
Music v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Industry groups also challenged the Rule. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Spicy IP) Opposing identical trade mark registrations (International Law Office) Ireland Economic stimulus for intellectual property in Ireland (Patent Baristas) Israel Adjudicator at Israel Patent Office rules on late filing of evidence (The IP Factor) Japan Super accelerated examination (IP Frontline) Kenya Kenya exercises power to deal with substandard batteries (Afro-IP) Korea Determining reasonable remuneration for… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:21 am
For that reason, Parker v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
See also: National Post – Supreme Court Won’t Hear U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
See also: National Post – Supreme Court Won’t Hear U.S. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm
Lawyers are a powerful profession, and when that power is abused it can understandably be problematic. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
The Center for American Progress has created a national map on this issue, which NPR also covers. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., No. 16-883 (secondary indicia as part of eligibility analysis). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
Romney about INS v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm
Sadly for Todd and Meadows, Ginsborg's article follows close on the heels of Brian Carson's powerful blog post, Time to Reinstate FTC Guidelines for the Legal Publishing Industry, which was inspired by another recent case of West Publishing overreaching: Rudovsky v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
Currency and National Debt in Comparative Perspective1. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
See, e.g., Hill v. [read post]
