Search for: "Nelson v. State" Results 861 - 880 of 2,066
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2015, 11:30 am by Friedland Law Group
After nearly a year and a half of litigation, parties to the case of Estate of Nelson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:30 am by Elaine Craig
Through detailed archival and interview based research, Boucai offers a delightful recounting of the first three cases to produce reported judicial opinions denying gay marriage in the United States: Baker v Nelson, Jones v Hallahan, and Singer v Hara (all of which were decided in the early 1970s). [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Beydoun, Facing Mecca from Prison: Religious Accommodation of Muslim Prisoners Before Holt v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:41 am by Amy Howe
Coverage and commentary continue to focus on King v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
Significantly, the brief cites statements by Senator Ben Nelson that he understood that FFM states could grant tax credits. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am by Amy Howe
  In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on the focus on the views of Senator Ben Nelson, the now-retired Democrat from Nebraska who, during the debate over the Affordable Care Act, “insisted that states take the lead in establishing the exchanges” where individuals could purchase health insurance. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:55 pm by Joe Patrice
This time it's former Senator Ben Nelson who Obamacare challengers cite for their claim that the Senate never intended subsidies to go to states without their own exchanges. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 11:56 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Nelson that “based upon” does not necessarily “require that each and every element of a claim be commercial activity by a foreign state. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:11 pm by Guest Blogger
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson TebbeIn Holt v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
Nelson, so that is the answer to both questions; and, second, federal courts have no jurisdiction to rule on matters of domestic relations, including marriage, so the regulation of marriage has to be left to the states to decide. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Nelson is binding precedent as to petitioners’ constitutional claims. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Lyle Denniston
Nelson, declaring that a claim to same-sex marriage did not raise “a substantial federal question. [read post]