Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 861 - 880 of 2,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2015, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Wednesday 18 March it will hand down judgment in the following: R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on whether the Benefit Cap (Housing Benefit) Regulations 2012 are unlawful owing to disproportionately affecting single parents and domestic violence victims, who tend to be women, and also whether they fail to have regard to the best interests of the child; BP Shipping Ltd & Anor v Braganza involving the investigations carried out by the… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:34 pm by Ronald Mann
Like most bankrupts, the debtor in this case (respondent Village at Lakeridge) owed money to a variety of entities. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 7:26 am by Giles Peaker
The respondent, by Mr Hartley, says that it did because it was dangerous. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Eric Goldman
At the same time, most Internet services typically respond to court judgments of defamation by removing the user content. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm by chief
Mr F's argument before the Court of Appeal, was that either ss.118 or 124 of the 1985 Act imposed duties on local authorities, which were owed to their tenants. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm by chief
Mr F's argument before the Court of Appeal, was that either ss.118 or 124 of the 1985 Act imposed duties on local authorities, which were owed to their tenants. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:10 am by Ruth Bonino
Senior employees may well owe fiduciary duties (which will again be determined by the contract) but it is important to note that these are not necessarily the same in scope as fiduciary duties owed by directors. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
This duty could be extrapolated from Williams v. [read post]