Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 861 - 880
of 925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
United States District Court Judge James Robertson for the District of Columbia, issued an order in USA v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:10 pm
Rather, the lots had always been united as a single parcel with a single owner. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 5:44 am
United States, No. 07-5191 (D.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
(United Transportation Union v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 2:03 am
Kamaole Pointe Development LP v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:05 am
Congress ought to be presumed to understand these well-settled principles -- principles that derive from a dispute involving the United States itself. [read post]
3 May 2008, 8:05 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 12:15 pm
United States, No. 06-87L (Apr. 15, 2008), where the landowner sought compensation after the Fish and Wildlife Service designated property as critical habitat for the Mississippi Sandhill Crane. [read post]
2 May 2008, 8:40 am
Ellis v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:11 am
United Parcel (SD Ind., Judge Young), a 14-page opinion, Judge Evans writes:This case centers around United Parcel Service's nonfraternization policy, which forbids a manager from having a romantic relationship with any hourly employee, even an employee the manager does not supervise. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:56 am
Schooner Harbor Ventures v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:17 am
United States, No. 06-876L (Feb. 22, 2008), a San Diego, California-area property owner sued the federal government in the Court of Federal Claims for just compensation, complaining of the Border Patrol's violation of its property rights:As a result of these initiatives since September 11, 2001, IIP states that Border Patrol agents occupy Parcel 11 on an around-the-clock basis. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 11:35 am
Warren v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
" State of Indiana v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:53 pm
United Parcel Serv., Inc., decided last month by the Hamilton County Court of Appeals, rejects that longstanding conventional wisdom, and holds that plaintiffs have six years to bring such age claims. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007
For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
Save Round Valley Alliance v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
Save Round Valley Alliance v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 4:01 am
United Parcel Service [read post]
