Search for: "Patently Yours"
Results 861 - 880
of 15,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2006, 3:45 pm
I have a rule of thumb for pro se applicants, and that is if the patent is protecting a product that could generate up to $100,000 per year in revenue, go ahead and write your own patent because the likelihood than anyone would sue over the patent is very small. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 9:15 am
Like any new technology, it can take some getting used to—but once you get the hang of it, it can make your life much easier. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 1:15 pm
The answers to these questions largely depend upon your point of view, and as with most complex topics, the truth is nuanced. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 9:15 am
Like any new technology, it can take some getting used to—but once you get the hang of it, it can make your life much easier. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:02 am
Mason Boswell: "a patent is by nature an offensive tool" Former Microsoft developer and current patent lawyer Mason Boswell wrote this: "My main reaction is that this sounds like a great way to make your patent portfolio valueless. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:24 pm
Since your orange juice squeezer and air pump represent an obvious combination, unfortunately you will not be granted patent. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
"element A for effecting (a, to, with, of, in, on, over) element B"Use dependent claims to "structurally" define elements and/or "functionally" define effectsUse "claim-type differentiation" to diversify the same elements and effects in parallel claim groupings (see slide #7)Use even uncommon claim types for your area of technology Avoid unnecessary "hybrid structural/functional" recitationsAppeal rejections that are merely demands for… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:08 pm
Nevertheless, I welcome your comments on the blog. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:37 am
What's your favorite phrase? [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 9:59 pm
I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900 or James@OCPatentLawyer.com. [read post]
31 May 2005, 8:29 pm
Patents, by their very nature, grant the right to exclude your competitors from stealing the fruits of your labor, and yet this powerful tool appears to be overlooked by the majority of the industry. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 10:28 am
Continue reading this post on Patently-O. [read post]
18 May 2006, 1:56 am
In other words, if you don't visibly participate in the marketplace, your mark has no value and therefore deserves no protection. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:30 pm
Just click on this voting link and cast your vote for whomever (*cough* BlawgIT *cough*) merits your consideration. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 10:11 am
The Patent Office would consider that person’s patent application to be prior art against your application thereby denying you a patent. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:17 pm
Your comments are requested by 25 February 2011 and the Committee is scheduled to report by 16 June 2011. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:16 am
Here, we can rely at least partially upon a competitive spirit — no one wants a competitor’s patent to issue, and the Peer-to-Patent approach provides a straightforward method to ensure that your path is not blocked. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
The post The Categorical Imperative for Innovation and Patenting appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
” Greyscale drawings can really destroy the quality of your patent drawings once uploaded to the Patent Office. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
” Greyscale drawings can really destroy the quality of your patent drawings once uploaded to the Patent Office. [read post]
