Search for: "Paul Samuel"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
” Justice Samuel A. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Forty-seven members and associates of the Elm Street Wolves-STEVEN KNOWLES, MICHAEL ANDREWS, GLEN BASKET, JEROME BROOKS, ROBERT BRUCE, STANLEY BRUCE, MARCUS CHAMBERS, GERALD CHARLES, GERARD CHARLES, MICHAEL CLEMONS, QUEJUAN COLLINS, MICHAEL DENNIS, RAYVON DIAZ, JOSEPH DUQUESNE, JAMES EDMONSON, KYLE ELLISON, CHRISTOPHER GLIVENS, CHRISTOPHER GRANGER, DEXTER GRANGER, KAREEM GRANGER, RYAN GRANGER, DAQUAN GREENE, PAUL HARDY, JASON HARRIS, TYREE HUGHES, WILLIE JACKSON, MARK JONES, RASHAD MCNULTY,… [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
” Paul M. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
That is something Paul Somers did not do. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:46 pm
” Justice Samuel Alito also appeared more inclined to uphold the laws. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:23 pm
Justice Samuel Alito asks about a World War II-era decision in which the justices upheld a law that stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to consider the validity of a wartime price regulation when raised as a defense to a prosecution. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 11:00 am
• Samuel F. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Samuel J. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:52 pm
Early in the argument, Justice Samuel Alito jumped in to advance an argument not raised or endorsed by the government. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:47 am
Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh seemed especially interested in whether Section 1252(d)(1) clearly indicates Congress’s intent to limit the availability of appellate review. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
Justices Samuel A. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
However, as a question posed by Justice Clarence Thomas early in the argument illustrates, not only do scholars and advocates on opposite sides of the case read the relevant history differently; there is profound uncertainty over what history counts.Justice Thomas’s QuestionAttorney Paul Clement argued the case for the plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito Jr. and Chief Justice John Roberts peppered the plaintiffs’ attorney with questions focused on, as Justice Alito asked, “What business does [this] case have in the courts of the United States?” [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 10:44 am
Justice John Paul Stevens voted in the most decisions in instances when Kennedy sat out. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:21 pm
., writing for the majority and Justice John Paul Stevens for the dissent. ** By a unanimous vote, the Court ruled that an individual or entity making a RICO civil racketeering claim based on mail fraud need not prove that it had directly relied upon the misrepresentations claimed. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
The case pits two former solicitors general against each other, with Paul Clement for the Archdiocese and Don Verrilli for WMATA. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:54 pm
Judge Paul Matey dissented: Refreshing our recollection illustrates the problem with remand. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:26 am
Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
The majority in Smith was written by Justice Antonin Scalia and drawn from the Court’s more conservative Justices: William Rehnquist, Byron White, John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O’Connor, and Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:30 am
Justice Samuel Alito took both of his oaths privately just hours after his confirmation on Jan. 31, 2006. [read post]
