Search for: "Pb, Appeal of" Results 861 - 880 of 1,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2011, 5:54 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Does that mean the program itself will be overturned as illegal in and of itself on appeal? [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 7:53 am
The Congressman has suggested no other reason why return of such documents is required pursuant to Rule 41(g) and, in any event, it is doubtful that the court has jurisdiction to entertain such arguments following the return of the indictment against him while this appeal was pending. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 9:16 am
Defendant never specifically address the issue he appealed on in the motion or the hearing so he can't complain that the trial court did not rule on it. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 7:50 am
Without a motion to dismiss or summary judgment, a denied plea of qualified immunity in a search case is not appealable. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:48 am
The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld a decision of its Court of Appeals that the trial court's finding of reasonable suspicion was clearly erroneous. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
A defendant who fled in the 90's and left his codefendant for trial, and the co-defendant lost at trial but won his search issue on appeal, could not plead law of the case because the evidence at the trials was different. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:53 pm
Lief, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that a magistrate judge may rely on facts included in two separate affidavits presented a day apart. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
As the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has stated: The Buie court explicitly declined to hold that the danger inherent in executing an arrest warrant will ipso facto justify a protective sweep. ... [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:43 am
Williams, 124 F.3d 411, 417 (3rd Cir. 1997) ("every court of appeals that has addressed video surveillance has held that video surveillance conforming to the standards set out in Title III is constitutional"); Koyomejian, 970 F.2d at 542 (court looked to substantive requirements in Title III for guidance in determining whether silent video surveillance comported with Fourth Amendment requirements); Nerber, 222 F.3d at 605 ("Although no federal statute regulates the… [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 5:42 am
Suffice it to say, the appeals court has "generously" interpreted the reach of the Fourth Amendment as it pertains to temporary residents of a dwelling. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 8:37 pm
Prior appeal only held that plaintiff did not have an expectation of privacy in the allegedly abandoned premises. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
We agree with the position of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:40 am
United States, 200 F.3d 179, 185 (3d Cir. 1999), the Court of Appeals explained that it was reasonable for officers to handcuff occupants of a house face-down on the floor during a search for narcotics due to the legitimate interests in preventing flight, preventing disposal of narcotics and agent safety. [read post]