Search for: "People v David S."
Results 861 - 880
of 5,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
” David G. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Salazar v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:35 pm
As in the years after Brown v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:31 pm
People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:35 am
But, since the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Kelo v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
Utah v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
A lot of people burned the midnight oil to get their filings in, so we should pour one out for every person listed on the brief captions and the team behind them. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 10:09 am
Not an entirely lost art . . .Brandt v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:55 am
" David G. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:08 am
"But what's it like actually making (and living with) that choice? [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
Our brief was written by Professor David Post, and by Jonathan Sherman, Perry M. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:39 am
David E. [read post]
10 May 2007, 8:09 am
David's going to write a blog! [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:21 pm
This is usually found in David v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 3:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:23 am
Editor’s note: This is a guest blog post by David Deitch, a Washington, D.C. [read post]
