Search for: "People v. Bounds" Results 861 - 880 of 3,573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2020, 8:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
: Password-sharing is a “ubiquitous, useful, and generally harmless” activity that “millions of people” engage in, United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am by Stephen Griffin
  After all, in the wake of the Civil War the people who were most determined to assert legal continuity were former Confederates, not radical Republicans. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am by Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
The 21st edition of The Bluebook was just released, and you can now purchase the traditional wire-bound paper copy for $45. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As a justice, his dissents in Lochner v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Debates about "nationwide" or "cosmic" injunctions mistake the real grievance: the geographic scope is far less important than the people who are bound by the order. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am by JB
The answer that people gave was that as long as limits on association were symmetrical between the races, they were constitutional.We can see this logic at work in Pace v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
Article IV territorial officers hold "Office[s] under the Authority of the United States," and are bound by the Sinecure Clause. [read post]