Search for: "People v. Grand" Results 861 - 880 of 2,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2014, 10:16 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 Ackerman argues further that anti-humiliation is the premise behind United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:15 pm by Erin McCarthy Holliday
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] in Currier v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:27 am
Here are the facts:Following a Grand Jury Indictment for extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
It is also somewhat surprising that the Court did not deal with the reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights in its Grand Chamber decision in Barbulescu v Romania (2017) 44 BHRC 17 or in its admissibility decision in Garamukanwa v UK (app. no 70573/17, decision of 6 June  2019). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  While the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive regulated the behaviour of communications providers generally, Article 1(3) of that Directive specifies that matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security) fall outside the scope of the directive, which the Court described as relating to “activities of the State” . [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 12:40 pm by Jeff Gamso
Supreme Court Mondy in Mullenix v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:40 pm
  Who now gets to hang in prison with some of the people he helped put there. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am by David Smith
" The Court considered a Grand Jury presentement from 1865 but did not find it particularly useful and also concluded that the road had not been repaired at public expense. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am by David Smith
" The Court considered a Grand Jury presentement from 1865 but did not find it particularly useful and also concluded that the road had not been repaired at public expense. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:06 am
. * This is Fiction, not Trademark Infringement: A Cat (Woman) in Need of a Clean Slate is a case review by Marie-Andrée on Fortres Grand Corporation v Warner Bros, no. 12-cv-00535. [read post]