Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 861 - 880
of 44,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
” On May 10, the Supreme Court Historical Society and the Supreme Court Fellows Alumni Association host a “Look Back” at Gideon v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:05 am
Additional Resources: Panzera v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
(People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 3:30 pm
There may be tweaks around whether the particular statute in question covers a certain type of property (see, e.g., Palacio Del Mar Homeowner's Association, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
” In People v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 6:17 am
In State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
An experience which may or may not be entirely fun, but is certainly a lot -- lot -- better than prison.Doesn't make much sense.We also might want to compare the Appellate Division's ruling here to other forfeiture cases. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:37 pm
While the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court may doubt the existence of the CSI Effect, it recently ruled in Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 8:13 am
State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:30 pm
See People v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:26 pm
Today, the Court presiding over the Carnival pollution case styled U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:02 pm
("Defendant missed a CONREP appointment in May 2009. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:04 pm
(Though, to be honest, I think that Justice Liu may be expressing a hope rather than giving a neutral evaluation of the majority's holding. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
They may not be sure of exactly what the law is or whether the misstatement was prejudicial. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
And I can only hope -- and it's a hope, not a certainty -- that it's not for hurting someone.But, yep, I get it; the statute requires a particular type of evidence, and there wasn't pretty much any type of relevant evidence admitted at his trial.Which may perhaps dictate the result, but doesn't alleviate my concern.Second, the Court of Appeal also holds that Mr. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:51 am
As I read that portion of the Court of Appeal's opinion, I simultaneously thought (1) that that reasoning had some persuasive merit, but (2) that it was nonetheless a little weird to be quoting from a dissent, which only highlights the fact that the current opinion -- which goes even further than that earlier case -- may perhaps be somewhat "pressing the envelope".Though I think I understood the opinion's discussion of Justice Benke's dissent a little better once I got to the very end… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:33 am
Kus v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:03 am
.'Cause that's indeed how I read it.Now, maybe the Court of Appeal is saying: "Since temporary tags are usually entered into the computer database, when the database doesn't show them, an officer may permissibly stop the car. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:06 am
Plus, assuming good behavior, the guy who actually committed the murder may well be out by then, since he got 25 to life as part of his plea deal. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 2:29 pm
Even if -- and this may stun you -- they are not all that desperately concerned about the welfare of your taillight. [read post]
