Search for: "People v. Mines"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2016, 6:30 am
The change a small group of people can make, doing it together — that’s the DIT part of the title of this series of posts, and I now realize that this is the post with which the series should have started — is both remarkable and inspiring. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
In other news, Ministers have been urged to reassess the law giving anonymity for people making allegations about sexual offences. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
” [The emphasis is mine – GBH.] [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:32 am
In Ferrerese v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm
We could not just rock up at court and advise people. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Titanic v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:55 pm
It’s no business of mine. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:28 am
He successfully argued on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 8:04 pm
“I’m looking for people who understand the way the real world works,” Clinton said. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
” (Cairns v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 8:40 am
” Paragraph 9 also states that: “The Party must respect work, knowledge, talent and creation and ensure that development is for the people, by the people and with the people sharing in its fruits. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:38 am
What about mine? [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
For the Symposium on the Constitution and Economic InequalityCynthia EstlundJoseph Fishkin and William Forbath, in their book-in-progress, have brilliantly exposed and mined a once-powerful, mostly-forgotten vein of constitutional political economic thought: the notion that widely shared economic opportunity, and a broad middle class flanked by neither an underclass nor an oligarchic overclass, are essential foundations of our republican form of government. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:48 am
I get that many people share Balko’s broad emphasis, and that they see mine as nitpicking. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 2:58 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Perhaps most interestingly, the issue in the case also pits the federal government against various native peoples, and various native peoples against other native peoples. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:20 am
Spokeo, Inc., and United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, et al., 796 F.3d 18 (D.C. [read post]
