Search for: "People v. Richard"
Results 861 - 880
of 3,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
If most of the people I write about are extremists, then postwar movement conservatism -- and perhaps conservatism per se -- are extremist. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:22 pm
What we’re doing in © is important but what’s more important is the right to copy and talk.Commentary by Richard Stallman, Free Software FoundationDefaults are tremendously important. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
On the same day, Richard Spearman QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) handed down judgment in the case of Otuo v The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society[2019] EWHC 1349 (QB) (heard 1-14 and 25 to 29 March and 1 April 2019). [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
But I continue to believe that the 1968 and 1992 elections, to mention only two especially significant post-World War II elections (and not, for example, the 1912 or 1860 elections), present their own problems inasmuch as the two winners, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, had the demonstrated support of only 43% of the population, and, of course, were faced as well by a “divided” Congress in which at least one house was controlled by the opposition party. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
There were, to be sure, some gadflies, such as Richard Epstein at the University of Chicago who denounced the New Deal in root and branch, as well as Gary Lawson and Randy Barnett, all of whom conveyed a distinctly libertarian sensibility. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
The judgment follows the precedent set in Richard v BBC, that individuals investigated by law enforcement bodies have a reasonable expectation of privacy as a matter of general principle. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:47 am
Prelude: After a night at the bars, a man wakes in a room with a psychopath Richard G. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
McAllen Hospitals, L.P. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:56 am
In that ruling, the Court said that Congress lacked the general power to inquire into people’s private lives. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
Jacob Rowbottom and Richard Wingfield. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:15 am
Try reading "have, v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as the framework through which collectives (the state, the… [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
There are too many possible stories about how you are the people, and the other people are usurpers or mobs. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The types of people appointed to the court have also changed. [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:20 pm
Just as one example, in the 1987 case of Florida v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:45 am
” Sussman v. [read post]
