Search for: "People v. Spellings"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,014
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Social distancing mandates forced the closure of many workplaces, schools, stores, playgrounds, and other places where people congregate with non-household members. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 10:20 am
In Roverano v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:20 am
The trial verdict in Wakefield v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:15 pm
We are skeptical that Heckler v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
They are a necessary incantation, an opening spell, that makes it possible to then enter into the discourse of trench warfare. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:41 am
Wilson, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 7:32 am
Notice and takedown laws also exist to protect people who are harmed by online content. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
(Easterling v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:19 am
Finally, Internet companies aren’t “infringing on people’s right to speak. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:33 pm
In fact, the issue of whether the police need a warrant to draw blood from a suspect was clearly addressed in Birchfield v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:00 am
When you take issue with a belief or position, one argument you can employ is called reductio ad absurdum, which sounds like a Harry Potter spell but is actually the Latin phrase “reducing to absurdity. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
How else to explain the actions of FBI agents who misled a court to obtain a search warrant and then violated the express limitations in the warrant, seizing property they had no business taking from hundreds of people? [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
But Dinan focuses on something even more important about most of the states: With only one exception (Delaware), they reject what Madison was so proud of in Federalist 63, i.e., the removal from “we the people” of even an iota of an ability to engage in direct governance. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Yet he emphasizes that "we don't always line up 6-3, 5-4, the way some people tend to think. [read post]
