Search for: "People v. Taylor"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
They should be taken as a sign of our continuing commitment to the law-abiding people of Newburgh. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
They should be taken as a sign of our continuing commitment to the law-abiding people of Newburgh. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm
The Supreme Court's affirmation of the ancient common law right of trial by jury in SEC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Araba Taylor: “The Case of the Rustat Memorial – Does Duffield Pose all the Right Questions? [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 9:47 pm
The New York case of People v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
21 Sep 2006, 2:03 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
All of the opinions in NFIB v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:36 pm
That's because courts have shunned the only means available for obtaining relief: Bivens v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:05 pm
Taylor Hall of 9to5Mac discusses the new Portraits watch face coming to watchOS 8 this Fall. [read post]
Texas' new sex offender law misplaces focus on stranger danger, could make victimization more likely
21 Oct 2007, 11:25 pm
"Unfortunately, the majority of sex crimes involve people like 'Uncle Jimmy,' " he said, "and Uncle Jimmy's not a monster. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:21 am
It isn’t a problem any more though because of the case of Spencer v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 7:11 am
[The case may get refiled, but it’s not looking promising. ] From Atas v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:28 am
(See Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
Some argue that it might deter people from using the Court. [read post]
