Search for: "Petition of Smith" Results 861 - 880 of 3,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2019, 4:24 am by Lev Sugarman
Smith, II discussed a failed coup within the Islamic State for this week’s Foreign Policy Essay. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:24 pm by Ilya Somin
Smith, one of the three judges on the Fifth Circuit panel that ruled against Murphy on procedural grounds. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Bethune-Hill, an appeal by Republican legislators of a lower-court ruling that requires 11 state legislative districts to be redrawn to correct racial gerrymandering, and Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 8:10 am by Lev Sugarman
Lev Sugarman shared a habeas petition filed by a man in indefinite immigration detention in New York. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Kathryn Moore has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:03 am by tshadduck
Hatfield, P.A. represents injured workers from all over Northwest Arkansas including Fort Smith, Springdale, Fayetteville, Rogers, Bentonville, Berryville and Harrison. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:50 am by Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield
Hatfield, P.A. represents injured workers from all over Northwest Arkansas including Fort Smith, Springdale, Fayetteville, Rogers, Bentonville, Berryville and Harrison. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:41 am
Thus, "If you can show that these possibilities are unlikely to occur, discuss this in your petition. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:37 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Petitions for rehearing en banc were filed by both the plaintiffs and the FHFA. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” Today’s second argument is in Smith v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Bethune-Hill and Smith v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 7:30 am by Kathryn Moore
The government, however, reconsidered its position before the Supreme Court in light of Smith’s petition for writ of certiorari and a recent decision by the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Since the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) became effective in 2012, Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) has been a popular legal option for challenging patent validity. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
USPS, posing the patent law issue (to quote SCOTUSBlog) of “Whether the government is a ‘person’ who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 1:48 pm by karen shephard
United States Postal Service  Issue: Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:19 pm by Patent Docs
Postal Service, which presented the simple question whether the federal government is a "person" entitled to petition for post-grant review under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act ("AIA"). [read post]