Search for: "Power v. State" Results 861 - 880 of 36,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2016, 2:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
 The Court’s jurisdiction had been challenged in an amicus brief filed in the case of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 10:39 am by Derek Muller
Anderson, the Supreme Court unanimously held that states lack the unilateral power to exclude presidential candidates from the ballot on the basis… Continue reading The post “Administering Presidential Elections and Counting Electoral Votes After Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
This article provides historical context and analysis of the Insular Cases, that series of decisions on the power of the U.S. government over territory and people under the Territorial Clause and criticizes the majority's use of it to justify the "situational" application of constitutional rights to subjects of United States law. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm by James H. Wilson, Jr.
No, a lump sum monetary award is properly enforced as a money judgment and not through the show cause process in Virginia, as explained in Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That religion may not define the public calendar and that a religious entity may not exert governing power.The landmark government power cases are Larkin v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 12:29 pm by Steve Vladeck
In contrast, the Justice Department during the eight years of the Obama administration sought extraordinary relief from the court exactly once — a petition for certiorari before judgment in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Chief Justice Marshall explained that “the power to tax involves the power to destroy,” and he reasoned that if States could tax the Bank they could “defeat” the federal legislative policy establishing it. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
The preparation of the decision appeared to have been delayed as the state court studied the Supreme Court's latest interpretation of the Vienna Convention (in Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]