Search for: "Precision Contracting, Inc." Results 861 - 880 of 1,202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:30 am by Ben Vernia
According to DOJ’s press release: Kaman Precision Products Inc., an Orlando, Fla., defense contractor, will pay the United States $4.75 million to resolve allegations that the company submitted false claims for non-conforming fuzes sold to the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Bexis
Centocor, Inc., 2008 WL 2565065, at *4 (D.N.J. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc. 92011) 52 Cal.4th 541, held that a plaintiff may not recover for reasonably incurred medical billings to the extent they are discounted under a plaintiff's private insurer's contract with the medical provider. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:48 pm
Contrary to the position taken by the majority, this is precisely the type of case to which Section 240 (1) was intended to apply. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Albany Steel Inc.,3 the plaintiff law firm sued to recover fees, alleging breach of contract, quantum meruit, and account stated. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm by Law Lady
 Contracts -- Insurance -- Discovery -- Request for production -- Insured is not entitled to discovery of insurer's claims file where insured has only alleged a breach of contract action, not a bad faith claims handling case -- To extent any of documents responsive to insured's request for production are contained within insurer's claims file, they are protected from disclosure -- Any documents not contained within claims file that are responsive to… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:16 pm by Jay McDaniel
Precision Lift, Inc., 654 F. 3d 289 (9th Cir. 2011) involved a failed joint venture between the plaintiff and defendant to build and market maintenance stands that allow mechanics to access the outside of aircraft. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:31 am by emagraken
The prejudice must affect the ability to respond to the amended claim: Bel Mar Developments Inc. v. [read post]