Search for: "Pure Precision Limited"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm
I hope the Supreme Court next faces a surveillance technique born purely on the Internet, one in which "classic trespassory search is not involved. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:57 pm
"There are experts, on both sides, who have taken pure advantage of this," he said. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
It requires difficult tradeoffs among multiple social goods, starting with security and liberty; this is the premise of Lawfare, but it takes by assumption that neither pure security concerns nor pure rights concerns ought to govern, absolutely and alone, a liberal democratic society. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
The second is more complicated—but also purely speculative at this point, especially because it’s not even clear Facebook and Twitter really want to be included or what their price and conditions for doing so would be. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:50 am
The second is more complicated—but also purely speculative at this point, especially because it’s not even clear Facebook and Twitter really want to be included or what their price and conditions for doing so would be. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am
On page 16, Judge Joanne Royce's dissent explains this precise point: Congress adopted SOX against a backdrop of corporate misconduct conducted on a global arena and was well aware that sustaining market integrity would require more than a purely domestic focus. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:15 am
When the Convention drafters “saved” forum procedure, they undoubtedly contemplated purely procedural rules such as those governing pleadings, time limitations, evidentiary rules and the like. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:07 pm
At least this time the danger is somewhat limited: by calling for the FTC to investigate Google, the senators are thus urging the agency to do . . . exactly what it’s already doing. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:38 pm
At least this time the danger is somewhat limited: by calling for the FTC to investigate Google, the senators are thus urging the agency to do . . . exactly what it’s already doing. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 12:23 am
UK Limited and others the ECJ is called to rule this time on the criteria for protection of a database by copyright law and more precisely on the protection of fixture lists by database copyright. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:45 am
The bat did precisely what it was intended to do -- allow the batter to propel the ball with power. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:46 pm
The second is that democracy may not be best served, and may indeed be extremely ill served, by media regulated according to purely market principles. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court has yet to rule on the precise scope of Congressional power to regulate intrastate activities for purely environmental concerns – although the Health Care litigation may give some hints. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Far from being predictable, this means that guessing how the ITC interprets the DMCA is pure speculation. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Indeed, various efforts seem underway precisely to shift the institutional posture of the case towards other possible configurations. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:58 pm
Arguing for a period of repose, he said that a Congress that could give repose to intentional fraudsters would not want to deny repose to a defendant in a purely prophylactic section 16(b) action. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
No more limitations on what may be searched and when! [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Precisely the question to ask, Judge Benefield -- why would anyone put such language in a deed? [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm
Da Silva testified that “this was because some local bars at the time were building teams purely to win, for self-promotion, and they did not care about the spirit of NAGAAA or the Gay Softball World Series. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:04 pm
During the argument, Judges David Sentelle, David Tatel, and Harry Edwards all pressed the petitioners’ counsel to articulate a limiting principle by which the panel might be able to recognize the reach of the Suspension Clause at Bagram without coming into conflict with Johnson v. [read post]
