Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 861 - 880
of 2,424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2011, 3:33 am
Otherwise, chances are pretty good that they will believe that you ruined their chances of "justice" by failing to raise that winner point, the one you left on the table.But try to cover them all and you can anticipate some snarky judge to write what Third Circuit Judge Aldisert did in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 8:07 am
Voting always matters, but it might matter more this year than in a very long time.With that, we take a quick look at Von Stade v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
/UK sanctions against the Trickbot cybercrime group, confirmation that Twitter’s sale will not be investigated by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), and the latest on Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:41 am
The following contribution to our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 8:11 am
As Judge Ellis stated in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm
An excerpt: So send a quick note to the reps of our state, And tell them everyone should be able to marry their soul mate. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:29 am
The opinion in US v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm
Johns River Management District In 2013, the Supreme Court enhanced property rights in the United States when it decided Koontz. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
By Bradley Graveline and Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:11 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:02 am
It has hundreds of thousands of customers in the state and earns millions of dollars in revenue from the state each year. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:40 pm
Sometimes experience is good, and sometimes it's good to instead get someone who perhaps brings a fresh perspective that's not been formed (and/or jaded) by prior work in the area.Which is why, for example, we don't have any service qualifications to become, say, President of the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
Hoehn, No. 11-16751 (9th Cir.) - United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 7:58 am
I namecheck podcast regular Paul Rosenzweig and others for a thoughtful report on Chinese platforms in the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 11:55 am
Gill, 2014 WL 1331013 (E.D.N.C. 2014) (citing United States v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:29 am
Department of Agriculture holding that California raisin handlers could assert a takings claim as an affirmative defense to an enforcement action filed by the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am
It has taken the Supreme Court of the United States less than two months since a mid-October hearing and less than ten pages (counting only the opinion per se, not the two-page syllabus) to determine and explain that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit got the law on design patent damages fundamentally wrong. [read post]
