Search for: "ROGERS v. UNITED STATES" Results 861 - 880 of 1,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] If SEC or other proposed federal regulation of cybersecurity becomes a reality, implementing the Framework could be a mandatory exercise. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Google doesn't want you to limit its ability to follow you around the internet http://t.co/9vYzPQjxcK -> RT @eurorights: 'French blogger owes $2,000 in damages for review 'too prominent' on Google'. http://t.co/UHMDvye7hC -> RT @thenetmonitor: Putin signs law that could end up blocking Facebook and Twitter in Russia http://t.co/gXCDBlKZps -> RT @PrivacyDigest: 26 Questions EU Regulators Want Google to Answer – Digits – WSJ http://t.co/wx2qjD1yBp ->… [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Many judges have relied upon that precedent in ruling against state bans on same-sex marriage, and the Supreme Court  commented favorably on that ruling a year ago in June when it struck down a federal law denying marital benefits to same-sex couples who were already legally married (United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers (another case out of Texas), which allowed the state to ban the use of certain trade names. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court released a few notable opinions this week: on Monday, it announced its ruling in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States came as quite a surprise. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
Since those companies were located outside the United States, the US used criminal prosecutions of their executives, who were then arrested as they happened to set foot in the country, often in transit at US airports. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:49 am by Barry Sookman
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in a 6 to 3 opinion yesterday that Aereo’s Internet retransmission service infringes copyright. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am by Jani
Under common law a mark is protectable through its use, or as was stated by Justice Pitney in United Drug Co v Theodore Rectans Co: "...the right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption; its function is simply to designate the goods as the product of a particular trader and to protect his good will against the sale of another's product as his". [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
He shared Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins’ statement in the 9/11 case United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:15 pm by Cyrus Farivar
Susie Cagle In a key transparency case, a federal judge has ordered the United States government to hand over four orders and one opinion from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) published in secret between 2005 and 2008. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Ritika Singh
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]