Search for: "RUSSELL v. STATE" Results 861 - 880 of 2,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Glen Hansen, Brian Russell and Dan Cucchi Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2017 2nd Quarter cumulative CEQA update. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York State Court of Appeals has held that the City Human Rights Law, one of the most expansive in the nation, does not allow plaintiffs to sue co-workers for discrimination, including the creation of a hostile work environment.The case is Russell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:25 am
On April 4, 2013, two weeks after Plaintiffs' claimed business-opening date, Defendants submitted articles of organization to the Indiana Secretary of State to form E Liquid Palace, LLC, while Defendant Russell Simon is listed as the owner of the "Electric Genie" trademark. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:54 am by John Jascob
A shareholder class action alleging that the defendants falsely stated that a financial company maintained its principal executive offices in the United States in order to satisfy the criteria for inclusion in the Russell 2000 Index, a small cap stock market index, so as to allow the firm to maintain its listing on the Nasdaq moves on (Desta v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Times, Ronald Collins/Concurring Opinions, video from Baca v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm by Matthew Landis
United States – barring police from using a thermal-imaging device to look into a home Florida v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni looks at Google v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Visciotti and its progeny, by finding a state court’s application of Beck v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
Based on an earlier Ninth Circuit decision, Pallas v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” For this blog, Kevin Russell considers why the court may have dismissed as improvidently granted Emulex Corp. v. [read post]