Search for: "Range v. Attorney General United States" Results 861 - 880 of 1,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
Justice Beatty apparently relied for his conclusion on the unsupported assertions of ECUSA's attorneys, made in a post-trial motion for reconsideration, that all the subject parishes had "acceded" to the Dennis Canon. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
Justice Beatty apparently relied for his conclusion on the unsupported assertions of ECUSA's attorneys, made in a post-trial motion for reconsideration, that all the subject parishes had "acceded" to the Dennis Canon. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
Class II devices are subject general controls and special controls. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm by James Yang
Basis for patent eligibility standards In July 2017, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published its PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER: REPORT ON VIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm by James Yang
Basis for patent eligibility standards In July 2017, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published its PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER: REPORT ON VIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 12:46 pm by John Floyd
  On August 18, 2017, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 11:44 am by Elbert Lin and Thomas M. Johnson Jr.
The attorney general of West Virginia, Patrick Morrisey, led a certiorari-stage amicus brief in support of the petitioners. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:00 am by Michael H Cohen
In this guidance, FDA notes that the FDCA “recognizes as official the drugs and standards in the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States and its supplements (the “HPUS”). [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:00 am by Michael H Cohen
In this guidance, FDA notes that the FDCA “recognizes as official the drugs and standards in the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States and its supplements (the “HPUS”). [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:00 am by Michael H Cohen
In this guidance, FDA notes that the FDCA “recognizes as official the drugs and standards in the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States and its supplements (the “HPUS”). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:24 am by Michael Barr
Federal and state enforcers, including the Department of Justice, FinCEN, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and state attorneys general and state regulators, frequently bring enforcement actions against banks to ensure compliance with the BSA’s requirements. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:40 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
District Court for the District of Columbia applied the Lone Steer standard to an OFCCP compliance evaluation dispute in its November 2011 decision in United Space Alliance, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:19 am by Mary B. McCord
  But to the extent that Bossert and others in the Administration still do not believe prosecution in Article III courts is a viable option for enemy combatants—as Bossert’s comments just last week suggest—they should consider the following: The Department of Justice and the United States Attorneys’ Offices have an almost perfect record of convictions in cases charging enemy combatants. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:39 am by Benson Varghese
While the Guidelines are no longer mandatory and federal judges have far more sentencing discretion since the United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
” The Constitution provides that the president, like the vice president and all civil officers of the United States, “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. [read post]