Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 861 - 880 of 30,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2013, 8:37 am by Wells Bennett
That’s the word on the street, the military judge having granted the defense’s request for a continuance. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the lower court materials in the case, now on appeal in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:29 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Today was the due date for amicus briefs supporting the state in Williams v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:00 am
While the case was pending on appeal, the United States Supreme Court rendered its opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:30 pm
Massachusetts OUI lawyers will continue to raise Sixth Amendment confrontation issues to challenge the admission of breathalyzer evidence at trial in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 1:35 am by Jody Coultas
Apple Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-2038, 17 February 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 1:12 pm by Jim Robinson
United States, No. 22-995 (2d Cir. 2023), the expertise of an Accident Investigation Expert Witness was critical. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:12 pm by Jim Robinson
United States, No. 22-995 (2d Cir. 2023), the expertise of an Accident Investigation Expert Witness was critical. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am by Marty Lederman
§ 7, the United States has recently taken the position that classifications based on sexual orientation should be subjected to heightened scrutiny. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:40 am
  So the company thus hoses the United States (and, secondarily, the states) for those taxes, which pay for unemployment benefits, and instead the employer and the Tribe keep for themselves (and then split) those taxes.How much money can you make this way? [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:29 pm by Kenneth Anderson
  Abstract: Article 2(4) of the United Nations (Charter prohibits the use of force between States, but that prohibition does not “impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations”. [read post]