Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS" Results 861 - 880 of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2023, 8:31 am by Ekaterina Pannebakker
On 24 February 2023, the Dutch Supreme court has ruled in the case Willemen Infra v Jura, ECLI:NL:HR:2023:313. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 11:29 am
The New York Court of Appeals recently accepted the following certified questions in Jaramillo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 The goal of the sellers is to maximize profits by selling worthless goods.Fake Meryet Amun statue placed in evidence in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The court found that the class, which consisted of purchasers and sellers of Elan Corporation American Depositary Receipts, satisfied the requirements of Rule 23 (a) and (b) (Kaplan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 10:18 am by Eric Goldman
Amazon * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:01 am by Eric Goldman
Sunfrog * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Sellers of certified goods and services (here, sellers of kosher products) can more easily attract the right consumers. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]