Search for: "SHARP v. UNITED STATES" Results 861 - 880 of 1,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
There clearly is a special role for the press in America’s democracy; the Founders explicitly intended the press to be a crucial check on the power of the federal government, and the United States courts have consistently backed up that role. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
It was Arzú who had just persuaded the United Nations to take Guatemala off its blacklist. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:11 pm by Gene Quinn
On Thursday, December 5, 2013, the United States House of Representatives passed the Innovation Act by a vote of 325-91. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Canada-Cameroon BIT signing; photo from DFATD In Hupacasath First Nation v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 3:31 pm by Barry Barnett
That the victims suffered harm outside the United States may not matter under RICO. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:35 am by Jeff Foust
In a sharp escalation of the ongoing debate over military launch contracts, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk announced Friday afternoon that the company was filing suit against the Air Force to formally protest a “block buy” contract the service made with United Launch Alliance. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm by Mark Walsh
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am by Eric Turkewitz
In other words, the damage to Katz’s reputation were based on the exceptionally sharp comments of Justice Hart. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The contours of that right are not clear, but they do not protect a former Assistant District Attorney in Brooklyn who lost his job after the DA learned that his father was running for office against a State Senator who was being prosecuted by his office.The case is Sharpe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Jon Robinson
  Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]