Search for: "STATE v. GARCIA" Results 861 - 880 of 1,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:01 pm by Adam Wagner
It recalls in this connection its judgment in the case of Garcia Alva v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 4:50 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
(Garcia, Michael) Petitions for Writ of Review—Premature Petitions—Court of Appeal denied defendant’s Petition for Writ of Review as premature, when WCAB, on its own motion, had granted reconsideration of decision… Employers Outsourcing, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 1:19 pm by Silver Law Group
You can read the petition for Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
Caulkett and Bank of America v. [read post]