Search for: "Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog" Results 861 - 880 of 1,489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Ken White
First, he's incensed that I represented Patrick Frey pro bono in a vexatious and malicious lawsuit attacking him for blogging at Patterico.com. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa [Eric's note: this is a long blog post from my colleague Tyler. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 7:17 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Learn more about Out for Freedom and other civil liberties issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Second, the Fourth Circuit majority said that the same functional reasons that had led the Supreme Court to reject a constitutional reporter-source privilege in Branzburg also counseled against recognizing a common-law privilege in Sterling. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Last year, I blogged extensively about the pending Fifth Circuit case on Fourth Amendment protection for cell-site data. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:09 am by The Charge
  While early justices (who also rode the circuit) seemed to grasp the metamorphic change wielded by the amended Constitution, See, i.e. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
§ 2072(b), which prohibits a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure from operating to “abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Hulu) http://t.co/FcBypcfwL1 -> US 1st Circuit affirms statutory damage award in Sony BMG v Tenenbaum http://t.co/ssyPB54Q82 -> Search of computer reasonable R. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm by LindaMBeale
Chadha, the Court found that the government's refusal to pay the tax refund, even after the Justice Department's decision not to defend such cases,  provide an existing Article III "case or controversy" before the Second Circuit and before the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:32 pm by Guest Author
  Vance appealed only the hostile work environment and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:53 am by Joe Consumer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recognized that if American Express's arbitration clause (and particularly its ban on class actions) was enforced, that would mean that none of the small business plaintiffs could enforce their rights under the antitrust laws. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm by Cicely Wilson
Hitchcock sued, alleging violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964/Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(k). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
United States 12-1092Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit erred when, in direc [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:07 am by Cicely Wilson
Lancaster, United States Supreme Court (5/20/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawIn 1993, Lancaster, a former police officer with a long history of severe mental-health problems, killed his girlfriend. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:30 am by Mary Dwyer
California State Council of Carpenters as adopted by the Third, Fifth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits; (2) the categorical test, permitting suits only by an actual competitor, employed by the Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits; or (3) a version of the more expansive “reasonable interest” test, either as applied by the Sixth Circuit in this case or as applied by the Second Circuit in prior cases. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Second, that attitude has seeped into the judiciary as well, including Democratic appointees. [read post]