Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 861 - 880
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm
See, e.g., McReynolds v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp and Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm
Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp, Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 2:02 am
A few days before the Apple v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
Decisions come down sooner only if a case is easily dismissed, and they take longer only under special circumstances such as when there are doubts over the validity of a patent and some guidance from the EPO (in an opposition proceeding) or the Federal Patent Court of Germany is expected in the meantime.Three more German cases are pending with the Dusseldorf Regional Court, but no trials have been scheduled yet in any of them:case no. 4c O 17/19 over EP2087629 on "a method of transmitting data… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:56 am
Dermatossian v New York City Tr. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 2:32 am
In 2008, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided, New Jersey v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:51 pm
These sharp racial and class disparities need urgent solutions, not more legal barriers. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
(See Durell v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:18 pm
Sharp (1948), Brown v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
. - For a sharp contrast to Alexander, take a look at Solomon, decided the same morning by the same court and with the same unanimous result. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Appeals There are two matters to be heard in the Court of Appeal Murray v Associated Newspapers Limited 20 or 21 January 2015 (5 hour appeal) Longmore, Ryder, Sharp LJJ. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
In Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EWHC Ch J20, the Court restrained publication of private etchings drawn by Queen Victoria and her husband. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:07 am
This document, a transcript of the August 18, 2006 hearing before Judge DeLaughter in the Wilson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 9:09 am
Over at Volokh, Prawfsblawg, and California Appellate Report, they're discussing People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:16 pm
He's a sharp contrast to Ms. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:52 am
Stoltz gets a criminal trial.Mind you, as a non- (or only partially-) legal matter, I will note the sharp contrast between the type of punishment the military thought was appropriate and what Stoltz is facing in federal court. [read post]
14 May 2010, 11:09 am
A. et al. v. [read post]
