Search for: "Shorts v. Superior Court" Results 861 - 880 of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The text of the Court of Appeals' decision in Colt v New Jersey Transit Corporation is set out below:   Colt v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The text of the Court of Appeals' decision in Colt v New Jersey Transit Corporation is set out below:   Colt v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 5:46 pm by Richard Primus
Last spring, I published a short essay about the relationship between the entry-ban litigation and Korematsu v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 5:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This would be a similar situation as abortion following R. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:35 am by Steven M. Sweat
Los Angeles Superior Court The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the plaintiffs in Los Angeles Superior Court on Friday, November 30, 2012, as an action resulting from a traffic collision that occurred in February 2011, with the defendant, Navarro Cortes. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
  Such a decision was the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Watson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:32 pm
  In particular, AT&T argued that under the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Verizon v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm by Ruthann Robson
 The lower courts had stopped short of this balancing because they considered Lane’s testimony to be in the course of his employment. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:04 pm by Matt C. Bailey
In short, the trial court rejected the entire premise of plaintiffs’ class action. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
But important to clarify the situations when a superior court may depart from a prior judgment of a court of coordinate jurisdiction; the standard is not that the prior decision was “plainly wrong”; a superior court judge in first instance should follow prior decisions made by their own court on all questions of law, including questions of constitutional law, unless one or more of the exceptions in Spruce Mills are met. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 1:49 am by Tessa Shepperson
  But first: The Supreme Court decision in Rakusen v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:14 am by Unknown
In short, “in an Up-C structure, the two classes have the same voting rights but different economic rights … In a dual class voting structure, the two classes have the same economic rights but different voting rights. [read post]