Search for: "Singer v. State" Results 861 - 880 of 964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
– Joint statement from the Online Commerce Roundtable participants on ‘Gerneral principles for the online distribution of music’ (1709 Copyright Blog) Enforcement of rights on the internet in Belarus and Ukraine (Class 46) Nokia sues Apple, says iPhone infringes patents (Ars Technica)   France Conseil Constitutionnel rules country’s new and improved internet disconnection law is now legal (Ars Technica)   Japan Winny developer acquitted -… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
- Joint statement from the Online Commerce Roundtable participants on 'Gerneral principles for the online distribution of music' (1709 Copyright Blog) Enforcement of rights on the internet in Belarus and Ukraine (Class 46) Nokia sues Apple, says iPhone infringes patents (Ars Technica) France Conseil Constitutionnel rules country's new and improved internet disconnection law is now legal (Ars Technica) Japan Winny developer acquitted - Japanese Court quashes conviction over… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
- Joint statement from the Online Commerce Roundtable participants on 'Gerneral principles for the online distribution of music' (1709 Copyright Blog) Enforcement of rights on the internet in Belarus and Ukraine (Class 46) Nokia sues Apple, says iPhone infringes patents (Ars Technica) France Conseil Constitutionnel rules country's new and improved internet disconnection law is now legal (Ars Technica) Japan Winny developer acquitted - Japanese Court quashes conviction over… [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:09 am by Katharine Van Tassel
It appears that the Botox suit is claiming free speech protections that are similar to those that are currently provided for dietary supplements under the questionable decision of Pearson and Shaw v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:28 pm
  Moreover, the Court held that under the rule promulgated in Wickens v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
 Yet, the applicability of this presumption across courts in the United States is an open question in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in eBay v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:03 pm
Miranda is "Paola Morena," a Latin singer. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:00 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property 'In re AOL' Formula Cited in Order That YouTube Pay ASCAP $1.61 Million Interim Fees for Video Use United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:33 am
Estis, a founding partner at Rosenberg & Estis, and Jeffrey Turkel, a partner at the firm, review the recent First Department case of Hirsch v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:02 pm
Second, we must ask whether each argument justifies its conclusion, or whether there is reason to see the argument as a rationalization of some deeper sort of anxiety or aversion ("animus", to use the language of Romer v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:04 am
New York City, 08-969), and a state legislature’s power to bar federal courts from ruling on class action cases that are based on state law claims (Shady Grove Orthopedic Association v. [read post]