Search for: "Smith v State"
Results 861 - 880
of 9,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2007, 12:30 pm
Cheryl Oddi-Smith. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am
In the intervening years, the Supreme Court has issued some good opinions, such as United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 5:11 am
What makes this interesting is that the court had already held, in Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:25 am
The Supreme Court of Virginia recently issued its opinion in the case Shevlin Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:25 am
The Supreme Court of Virginia recently issued its opinion in the case Shevlin Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:25 am
The Supreme Court of Virginia recently issued its opinion in the case Shevlin Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Not so—as the Smith decision accurately stated, the “vast majority” of prior cases had applied the Smith approach. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Not so—as the Smith decision accurately stated, the “vast majority” of prior cases had applied the Smith approach. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am
Supporters argued that the theory had roots in Smith itself (specifically its explanation of the earlier Sherbert v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:13 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:57 am
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age… [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:03 am
Finn v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
Robert Lee Meneffe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court’s analysis in Smith v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:54 am
Smith v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 2:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 5:25 pm
In 2004, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals was the first federal appeals court to rule in favor of a transgender plaintiff, in Smith v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
In his majority opinion, Judge Smith wrote that the Administrative Procedure Act does not "require[] the Secretary to remove any alien or to alter his enforcement priorities," and he quoted with approval "the Supreme Court’s description, in [Reno v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
