Search for: "South Carolina Supreme Court" Results 861 - 880 of 4,582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2008, 2:46 pm
An opinion of the South Carolina Supreme Court was reissued when the sanctioned attorney discovered a scrivener's error while preparing a petition for reinstatement. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:09 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Georgia Supreme Court has imposed an interim suspension of an attorney based on a South Carolina sanction. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:42 am by Legal Profession Prof
A former Aiken County Magistrate has been publicly reprimanded by the South Carolina Supreme Court: At the conclusion of a session of bond court, respondent kissed the clerk who had been working with him on the forehead. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:00 am by tortsprof
In an opinion filed on Monday, the South Carolina Supreme Court adopted the risk-utility test for design defect cases, rejecting use of a consumer expectations test. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:07 am by Legal Profession
A non-attorney may file a claim on behalf of a business entity in probate court without running afoul of unauthorized practice restrictions, according to an opinion issued today by the South Carolina Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:51 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
South Carolina Rule of Evidence 106, the "rule of completeness," provides that When a writing, or recorded statement, or part thereof is introduced by a party, an adverse party may require the introduction at that time of any other part... [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:34 pm
The Supreme Court held that Cropper's statement to police does not qualify as excited utterance. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:33 am by Gregory Forman
Argabright, the South Carolina Supreme Court affirmed a permanent restraint against Mother exposing Child to her convicted sex-offender boyfriend [Doe] until the Child turned age eighteen. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 4:34 pm
The South Carolina Supreme Court issued a decision earlier this week that is important for those involved with or interested in adoptions, particularly as to the issue of notice. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Jack Pringle
” The Fourth Circuit (which of course includes South Carolina) reiterated the Marek rule last month in Bosley v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:33 am by J. Tom Minor, IV
The South Carolina Supreme Court recently decided two cases which ruled that a bank performing a closing on a bank loan was guilty of the unauthorized practice of law since the loan was closed without attorney supervision. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:35 am by Däna Wilkinson
Written by Spartanburg Bankruptcy Lawyer, Däna Wilkinson The South Carolina Supreme Court has ordered new mortgage modification procedures to be followed in foreclosure cases in South Carolina. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 9:48 am by Howard Bashman
And Joseph Bustos of The State of Columbia, South Carolina reports that “SC’s Tim Scott says Supreme Court vote on Judge Jackson won’t be based on skin color. [read post]
9 May 2007, 4:33 am
The Supreme Court disagreed, noting that purpose of the statute is the protection of the public and not with the protection of an individual's private right. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 7:20 am
South Carolina criminal defense lawyer Bobby Frederick has posted about the South Carolina Supreme Court's consideration of State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:58 am by Tracy Thomas
The State, SC's 6-Week Abortion Ban is Unconstitutional, State Supreme Court Rules The South Carolina Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the state’s six-week abortion ban, ruling 3-2 that it violated the state’s constitutional right to privacy. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:56 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The defendant appealed the ruling to the South Carolina Court of Appeals, where a decision was reached in the defendant’s favor. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:36 pm by Gregory Forman
That is the situation described in the March 21, 2018 South Carolina Supreme Court opinion of Ex Parte: Carter. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:38 am by Chirag B. Kabrawala
KabrawalaThe South Carolina Supreme Court’s ruling in Matrix Financial Services Corp v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:55 am by bvertz
The South Carolina Supreme Court rejected his argument that he was entitled to court-appointed counsel at his civil contempt hearing under the U.S. [read post]