Search for: "State v. B. Williams"
Results 861 - 880
of 3,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm
(U.S. 1940) (so are price-fixing agreements); United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:31 am
Doggett v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:53 pm
It was held in Williams v New York State and Ahlers v New York State Division of Parole that the imposition of a special parole condition is discretionary in nature and ordinarily beyond judicial review as long as it is made in accordance with law and no positive statutory requirement is violated. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:44 am
State of Indiana (NFP) William Messer v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:34 pm
. , William V. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:03 am
James B. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
Solicitor General, Donald B. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:17 am
") AC31051 - William B. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:22 pm
County of Riverside, 300 F.3d 1092, 1094-95 (9th Cir. 2002); Williams v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
CODE § 101.106(a)–(b). [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:59 pm
Defenders Of Wildlife v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
William J. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am
Illum v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 6:58 am
The case has already been the subject of many articles in the pay-to-play legal press and an excellent blog by William Goren.* The main lesson to be learned from Haynes v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 2:37 am
Nimmer & David Nimmer, 2 NIMMER ON COPYRIGHT § 8.11[A] (2007); William F. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
In False Advertising and the Lanham Act: Litigating Section 43(a)(1)(B), Thomas Williams addresses false advertising claims under Section 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York… [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:43 am
” Senior Judge Stephen Williams dissented, focusing his disagreement with the majority on Section 4(b). [read post]
