Search for: "State ex rel. Justice v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2021, 10:11 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
E.g., Meyer ex rel. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm
The Attorney General of the United States serves the USSC in an “ex officio” capacity (he cannot vote). [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Cook & Tommy Shaw Found. ex rel. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:36 am
Hawaii Tourism Authority ex rel. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:27 am
Ct. 644 (2023). [2] United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
In sum, the issue here is not so much the presence of governmental control over the activities of respondents, but rather the legislative delegation of control by respondents over a governmental entity (i.e, ECMCC) and its patently governmental activities.Regarding the Freedom of Information Law, Justice NeMoyer stated that:"The Legislature enacted FOIL to provide the public with a means of access to governmental records in order to encourage public awareness and understanding… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
Yesterday, in State ex rel. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 8:50 pm
Decision was invited by dissent in Polansky This decision comes on the heels of a dissent, included in the Supreme Court’s decision in 2023 in United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:54 am
This case is titled, United States ex rel Jones, et al., v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
Microsoft Corporation, C.A. 98-1232; State of New York, ex rel. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:16 am
Federal Law on Obscenity” published by the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 1:34 pm
The case is State ex rel Cincinnati Enquirer v. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 1:02 pm
” This case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 1:34 pm
The case is State ex rel Cincinnati Enquirer v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 3:36 am
Remember Case C-462/09 Thiuskopie v Opus?]. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 8:19 am
” U.S. ex rel. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 10:58 am
Ohio, ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Such laws did not violate the liberty of contact guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Justice McKenna wrote for the majority. [read post]
