Search for: "State of Georgia v. United States"
Results 861 - 880
of 2,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2020, 2:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 2:03 pm
” The state could exempt women because the wife is the subject to her husband under Georgia law. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
In Georgia, a defendant invoking Atkins v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
The myth of the isolationist United States is the myth that will not die. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:14 am
Georgia and the Death Penalty in Modern America, Oshinsky explores the case that nearly led to the demise of the death penalty in the United States and then to its eventual resurgence. [read post]
5 May 2009, 7:36 am
It was not until the August Term, 1792, that the Court rendered its first substantive decision, in Georgia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:17 am
Georgia Television Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:19 am
The state points to the two earlier versions of the order, which targeted Muslim countries, as well as comments and tweets made by the president calling for a ban on the entry of Muslims into the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
[6.18.2020] In what will likely be seen as a landmark decision for years to come, on Monday, June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down an opinion in the case Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 12:17 pm
Clayton County, Georgia, United States Supreme Court Case No. 17–1618 (June 15, 2020) [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am
Jackson filed her brief in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
As Wikipedia explains, [i]n the United States, removal jurisdiction refers to the right of a defendant to move a lawsuit filed in state court to the federal district court for the federal judicial district in which the state court sits. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:34 am
United States, 510 U.S. 163 (1994), which is “whether the factors militating in favor of [the proposed rule] are so extraordinarily weighty as to overcome the balance struck by Congress. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 5:07 pm
In Battelle Memorial Institute v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Kehr, Fundamental Rights in the United States Court of Federal Claims, 35 Regent University Law Review 233-256 (2023).Ariel J. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:07 am
Only in the United States of America. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
Neil Kinkopf is a professor of law at the Georgia State University College of Law. [read post]
