Search for: "State v. Coleman" Results 861 - 880 of 1,003
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
  But would we have preferred the Minnesota procedure in Coleman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:22 am
Patrick McHenry (PDF 76 KB)Letter Titled, "Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies Appropriations Act - Oppose Cuts to Census Funding" 06/30/2009 Opinion in the Matter of Norm Coleman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
Constitution and could be reviewed in the federal courts: the claim that Coleman’s right to an equal counting procedure in jurisdictions across the state — a right based on Bush v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:43 am
There was a campaign finance case a couple of years ago [called Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:02 am
Instead, it is a unanimous opinion stating: "Instant Runoff Voting as adopted in Minneapolis is not facially invalid under the United States or Minnesota Constitution, and does not contravene any principles established by this court in Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
"The State of California may be about to execute an innocent man. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:06 pm
However complicated you think the issues are, they are much more complicated.... [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
Coleman of Austin, Texas, that, when  the record actually assembled by Congress is examined, “I don’t understand how you can maintain that things have radically changed. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
 Coleman of Yetter, Warden & Coleman, in Austin, Texas, will argue for NAMUDNO. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
On April 22, the Court heard an extended — over seventy minutes long - argument in Ricci v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
DeStefano (07-1428) and Ricci v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
On Wednesday, April 22, in Ricci v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:26 am
Gregory Coleman from Austin, Texas will be arguing in both Ricci v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:35 am
Norm Coleman will now appeal to the State Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
  Last week, in State v. [read post]