Search for: "State v. Duty" Results 861 - 880 of 32,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2018, 3:40 am by IAN SKELT
It has been stressed that the question of whether the harm from a third party resulted from a positive act or from an omission by the police should not justify a different outcome and that the distinction was unmeritorious: Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2005] 1 WLR 1495 at [32] and repeated in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] 1 AC 1732 at [51]. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:20 pm
Providing legal representation and indemnification of State officers and employeesSamuels v Vacco, Appellate Division, 251 AD2s 10Section 17 of the Public Officers Law provides that a state officer or employee is entitled to representation by the Attorney General if the individual is sued as a result of his or her performing official duties. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
When he turned 18, the councils of Wiltshire, South Gloucestershire and Cornwall asked the Secretary of State to determine where Philip was ‘ordinarily resident’ for the purposes of the duty to provide accommodation under section 21. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:55 pm by Mike
The appeal was by way of case stated. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
In the case of V v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2016] EWCOP 21) the Court of Protection ruled that where a court has restricted the publication of information during proceedings that were in existence during a person’s lifetime, it has not only the right but the duty to consider, when requested to do so, whether that information should continue to be protected following the person’s death. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:38 am
Employee’s termination for off-duty misconduct bars unemployment insurance awardMatter of [Anonymous] v Commissioner of Labor, 38 AD3d 961A New York State Trooper was involved in a one-vehicle accident while off-duty. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:44 am
It does not require an intent beyond that just stated. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:04 am by Timothy Simeone
During Wednesday’s argument in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:54 am by Doug Cornelius
But if you look through the Act or the regulations you will not find a fiduciary duty stated. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:30 am by Glenn Rosen
Please note that this decision is from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal and while it is not binding on the state courts of California it is persuasive authority. 1 Yan Fang Du v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:00 am
  The New York Court of Appeals will address this duty of care issue this Thursday in an appeal entitled Stivers v. [read post]