Search for: "State v. English"
Results 861 - 880
of 6,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am
Michel V. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
State, supra.Clay v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
I covered the oral argument for this blog in Plain English, with other coverage coming from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
4 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V If the person claimed is under prosecution, either in the United States or Haiti, for any other crime than that upon which the demand for extradition is based, the extradition shall be postponed until the judgment is pronounced, and, if the person is convicted, until the sentence imposed is fully served or remitted. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under the stipulations of this convention, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 12:23 pm
These folks would like CA to distinguish itself from the reasoning of Garcia v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:12 pm
Either new strategies will have to be developed; otherwise it may be harder for States to resist the temptation of human shield strategies may be irresistible. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:38 am
For this reason, Mr Anson had paid federal and state tax in the US on his share of HV’s profits. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 9:23 am
Morales-Vázquez, No. 19-1503, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (January 19, 2021), Judge Bruce M. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
Additionally, the communications between the parties and reward offer were in English. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
Additionally, the communications between the parties and reward offer were in English. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
Aultman (1898) and United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am
The 2004 Directive was implemented into English law by the Immigration EEA Regulations 2006 (“EEA Regulations“). [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 20 provides that the requested State shall represent the requesting State in an proceedings in the requested State arising out of a request for extradition. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:13 am
Richard Ortiz – well, less so.United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 6:30 am
Through a reading of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]