Search for: "State v. Ferguson" Results 861 - 880 of 1,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
This prescriber testimony was uncontroverted, so the defendant won, despite the state-law presumption.Odom v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
"The court that decided Plessy v Ferguson consisted of judges that remembered slavery," he said. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 16 December 2020 (McCombe, Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 3 April 2019 (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Ferguson and who similarly ignored the wise corresponding dissent of that same Justice Harlan.Epstein writes about the PRA and the new damage rule:"The key damage provision states "The court shall conduct an analysis to ensure that a reasonable royalty . . . is applied only to that economic value properly attributable to the patent's specific contribution over the prior art. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Heller is distinguishable and its holding does not invalidate New York's gun possession laws or regulations"]; People v Ferguson, 21 Misc 3d 1120(A), *4, 2008 WL 4694552 [Crim Ct Queens County 2008] ["the requirement that handguns be licensed in the State of New York is not tantamount to a total ban and, therefore is not a severe restriction' as was the case in Heller"]; see also Mallard v Potenza, 376 Fed Appx 132, 134 [2d Cir] [affirming… [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:57 pm
Ferguson Beauregard/Logic Controls, Div. of Dover Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]