Search for: "State v. Grace"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 12:18 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
§102(b), there is a one year grace period for disclosures by the inventor. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 11:16 pm
The case is Alhovsky v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:35 am
Days later, he received a letter from Liberty Mutual stating that he was approved for intermittent leave for the period in question, with five days of leave permitted per month. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
On December 28, 2018, the Court in The California Institute of Technology v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:24 pm
He also raises Wisconsin v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
However, as the case above shows, an individual mark is not a viable alternative, at least not after the lapse of the 5-year grace period for non-use. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 11:34 pm
The Defendant (now in liquidation) did not show up to court and clearly stated that it had no intention of appearing either through the liquidators or the sole director and controlling mind.As the Defendant did not attend court, David Stone exercised his judicial discretion to strike out the Defence and Counterclaim. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm
Without embracing the equation made in Reynolds v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:46 am
I was thinking of this because Mitchell Shames, who is now an independent fiduciary at Harrison Fiduciary and before that was the long time general counsel for State Street Global Advisors (including during the time that the First Circuit blessed their structure for handling exactly these types of conflicts, in Bunch v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:57 am
Buchanan Roe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Wingerter v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm
Grace Mfg. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
[It] discusses TechSearch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
Francis College v. [read post]
