Search for: "State v. Hughes" Results 861 - 880 of 1,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am by Adam Craggs, Partner, RPC
Lords Hughes and Toulson disagreed with the majority on this issue. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
McGannon Award for work to advance the roles of women and people of color in the media reform movement, and won the 2015 Hugh Hefner 1st Amendment Award for framing net neutrality as a civil rights issue. [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Hughes. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
We had a post about this case by Hugh Tomlinson QC. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by David Spence
” About six months after the Court handed down its decision upholding Order 745, the Court also decided Hughes v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:03 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Expert witness — Text messages sent by defendant Robert Shawn Hughes, appellant, was convicted following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Harford County of possession of Oxycodone with the intent to distribute, possession of heroin with the intent to distribute, possession of heroin, and possession of cocaine. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am by Robert D. Williams
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Electric Power Supply Ass’n and Hughes v. [read post]